You are currently browsing the IPLicensing.net weblog archives for the day 1. February 2008.
- Ayn Rand (2)
- Blackberry (1)
- China (1)
- Cisco (1)
- Derivative Work (2)
- Disruptive Technology (3)
- Education (6)
- Election (2)
- Energy (1)
- Exclusivity (1)
- Facebook (1)
- Google (4)
- GPL (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Intel (1)
- Internet (2)
- IP (6)
- License Terms (3)
- Licensing (8)
- Linux (3)
- M&A (1)
- Microsoft (8)
- Music (1)
- Nortel (1)
- Objectivism (2)
- Oracle (1)
- Security (2)
- Skype (1)
- Start-ups (5)
- Strategic Alliances (1)
- Strategy (2)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Thomas Jefferson (1)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Web 2.0 (2)
- WiMAX (1)
- Wireless (2)
- Yahoo (2)
- 14. November 2008: The Big Three: Evolve or Die
- 10. November 2008: High Octane Intellectualism
- 4. November 2008: I guess God voted Democrat
- 14. September 2008: All is not rotten in the state of Denmark
- 2. August 2008: Homeland Insecurity?
- 1. August 2008: What have you done with your cognitive surplus today?
- 7. July 2008: US Immigration Policy & Global Competitiveness
- 16. June 2008: Colour Deaf
- 13. June 2008: WWJD?
- 22. March 2008: Should Atlas Shrug?
Archive for 1. February 2008
Licensing – Gut Check Time!
1. February 2008 by Martin Suter.
So you’re now thinking that licensing makes sense as a means of accelerating the time-to-market and monetizing your leading-edge technology. You’ve identified the gorilla as well as the chimps in your space, and managed to get the attention of at least one of them. They’ve probably begun posturing and now they’re coming to the table to discuss terms. For most companies, this is a classic “Oh shit!” moment.
As I blogged previously, before you agree to sit down, it is imperative that you have established clear guiding principles. Your internal stakeholders must understand, talk through and agree to a position on the major issues. These are the “non-negotiables”, and can help prevent bad decisions from being made in the heat of a negotiation. Each of these must be taken seriously, as getting them wrong can have a huge impact on valuation and even exit potential.
Issues to lose sleep over
· Exclusivity vs. non-exclusivity
· Derivative works
· Field of Use, Territory
· Indemnification
· Consideration (cash flow, NPV, etc.)
Each of these merits its own discussion. As my plane is now on final approach, I’ll have to get to these in future blogs.
That’s my .02!
Martin Suter
(martin.suter@iplicensing,net)
Posted in License Terms, Strategy, Licensing | Print | No Comments »