You are currently browsing the IPLicensing.net weblog archives for the day 2. August 2008.
- Ayn Rand (2)
- Blackberry (1)
- China (1)
- Cisco (1)
- Derivative Work (2)
- Disruptive Technology (3)
- Education (6)
- Election (2)
- Energy (1)
- Exclusivity (1)
- Facebook (1)
- Google (4)
- GPL (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Intel (1)
- Internet (2)
- IP (6)
- License Terms (3)
- Licensing (8)
- Linux (3)
- M&A (1)
- Microsoft (8)
- Music (1)
- Nortel (1)
- Objectivism (2)
- Oracle (1)
- Security (2)
- Skype (1)
- Start-ups (5)
- Strategic Alliances (1)
- Strategy (2)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Thomas Jefferson (1)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Web 2.0 (2)
- WiMAX (1)
- Wireless (2)
- Yahoo (2)
- 14. November 2008: The Big Three: Evolve or Die
- 10. November 2008: High Octane Intellectualism
- 4. November 2008: I guess God voted Democrat
- 14. September 2008: All is not rotten in the state of Denmark
- 2. August 2008: Homeland Insecurity?
- 1. August 2008: What have you done with your cognitive surplus today?
- 7. July 2008: US Immigration Policy & Global Competitiveness
- 16. June 2008: Colour Deaf
- 13. June 2008: WWJD?
- 22. March 2008: Should Atlas Shrug?
Archive for 2. August 2008
Homeland Insecurity?
2. August 2008 by Martin Suter.
So the Department of Homeland Security has revealed finally that it has the right to detain a person’s laptop at the border, possibly for months, with no suspicion of wrongdoing. (Washington Post article).
“The policies . . . are truly alarming,” said Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), who is probing the government’s border search practices. He said he intends to introduce legislation soon that would require reasonable suspicion for border searches, as well as prohibit profiling on race, religion or national origin.”
Senator Feingold is half right.
How do you require reasonable suspicion on the one hand and prohibit profiling on the other?
As a very frequent traveler, I am often shocked at what I see in airports these days. A few weeks ago, as I was putting back on my shoes and belt, I looked over to see an elderly, rotund woman, in tears, as she was being patted down and humiliated in plain view. The TSA employee was patting under her breasts with the back of her hand, looking for what, I have no idea. C’mon…When was the last time a 70 year old fat lady tried to hijack a plane? Or a 45 year old high tech executive father of two? Or a high school student? Or a…
You get the idea.
We live in a world where it is somehow deemed more acceptable to humiliate old fat ladies than it is to say out loud what we all know: radical Islamists are the threat, not my 14 year old son or the old lady next door, or me.
How will the DHS proceed if political correctness is a requirement? Will they have to pull aside and seize an equal number of laptops carried by business people, students and children – analyzing these before returning them months later? At what cost to the taxpayer? At what inconvenience to honest Americans?? And for what?!?
We lack the resources to treat everyone as a potential risk.
Put some wood behind the arrow, but aim it at the bullseye, not at me, not at my kids and not at fat ladies in wheelchairs.
That’s my .02!
Martin Suter
(martin.suter@iplicensing.net)
Posted in Security | Print | 3 Comments »